Intervencionismo endoscópico en la pancreatitis crónica / Endoscopic Intervention in Chronic Pancreatitis

Resumen La pancreatitis crónica es un trastorno irreversible y progresivo del páncreas caracterizado por inflamación, fibrosis y cicatrización. Las funciones exocrinas y endocrinas se pierden, lo que a menudo conduce al dolor crónico. La etiología es multifactorial, aunque el alcoholismo es el factor de riesgo más importante en los adultos. Si se sospecha pancreatitis crónica, la tomografía computarizada con contraste es la mejor modalidad de diagnóstico por imágenes. Aunque los narcóticos y los antidepresivos proporcionan el mayor alivio del dolor, más de la mitad de los pacientes eventualmente requiere una intervención por endoscopia o cirugía. La colangiopancreatografía retrógrada endoscópica es una alternativa eficaz para una variedad de terapias en el tratamiento de enfermedades benignas y malignas del páncreas. En los últimos 50 años, la endoterapia ha evolucionado hasta convertirse en la terapia de primera línea en la mayoría de las enfermedades inflamatorias agudas y crónicas del páncreas. A medida que avanza este campo, es importante que los gastroenterólogos mantengan un conocimiento adecuado de la indicación del procedimiento, mantengan el volumen de procedimiento suficiente para manejar la endoterapia pancreática compleja y comprendan enfoques alternativos a las enfermedades pancreáticas, incluidos el tratamiento médico, la terapia guiada por ecografía endoscópica, el manejo de las estenosis sintomáticas y cálculos, las intervenciones sobre el plexo celíaco y el drenaje de los pseudoquistes pancreáticos.

Abstract Chronic pancreatitis is an irreversible and progressive disorder of the pancreas characterized by inflammation, fibrosis and scarring. Exocrine and endocrine functions are lost often leading to chronic pain. Its etiology is multifactorial, although alcoholism is the most important risk factor in adults. If chronic pancreatitis is suspected, computed tomography with contrast is the best imaging modality. Although narcotics and antidepressants provide the greatest pain relief, more than half of all patients eventually require intervention by endoscopy or surgery. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is an effective alternative for a variety of therapies for treating benign and malignant diseases of the pancreas. In the last 50 years, endoscopic treatment has evolved to become the first-line therapy for most acute and chronic inflammatory diseases of the pancreas. As this field progresses, it has become important for gastroenterologists to keep their knowledge of indications for this procedure up-to-date and to perform a sufficient volume of procedures to allow them to manage complex pancreatic endoscopic therapy. Keeping up-to-date should include an understanding of alternative approaches to pancreatic diseases including medical treatment, therapy guided by endoscopic ultrasound, management of symptomatic stenoses and stones, interventions on the celiac plexus, and drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts.

Clinical analysis of optimal timing of endoscopic stone extraction following extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in patients with chronic pancreatitis / 中华胰腺病杂志

Objective To analyze the optimal timing of endoscopic stone extraction combined with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) in the treatment of chronic pancreatitis (CP) with pancreatic stones. Methods Data regarding 170 pancreatic stone patients receiving ESWL and endoscopic stone extraction at Shanghai Changhai Hospital from February 2014 to February 2015 were retrospectively analyzed. Based on the the prior history of endoscopic treatment,patients were divided into group A and B,and then sub-divided into three groups according to the timing of endoscopic intervention after ESWL including <12 h,12~36 h and >36 h subgroup. The success of pancreatic ductal cannulation, clearance of stone in the main pancreatic duct, and ERCP-related complications were evaluated. Results Among all the enrolled 170 patients,107 previously received ERCP(group A) while the others didn't(group B). The overall success rate of cannulation and clearance rate of stones at different times showed no significant difference. The success rate and clearance rate in group A in <12 h,12~36 h and >36 h subgroup were 91.7%,95.2%,78.0%,and 91.7%,95.2%,80.0%,and no significant difference existed. In group B, the success rate and clearance rate in <12 h, 12~36 h and >36 h subgroup were 66.7%, 71.4%, 96.3%, and 60.0%, 76.2%, 92.6%, and the differences were statistically different. The success rate and clearance rate of >36 h subgroup in group B were obviously higher than that in <12 hours (P=0.025) and 12~36 h subgroup (P=0.04). The timing of endoscopic stone extraction did not influence ERCP-related complications. Conclusions Early endoscopic stone extraction after ESWL can be considered in patients with pancreatic stones who previously underwent ERCP. Delayed endoscopic stone extraction after ESWL is recommended in patients without prior ERCP,which can help promote the therapeutic efficacy.

Endoscopic Approach via the Minor Papilla for the Treatment of Pancreatic Stones

BACKGROUND/AIMS: We aimed to evaluate whether the advanced techniques have influenced the minor papilla approach. METHODS: We studied the success rate of guide wire insertion by using ordinary techniques and advanced techniques (rendezvous method and precut method) in 30 patients via the minor papilla. We compared the selection of the access routes between before (52 patients) and after (28 patients) the introduction of the Soehendra stent retriever. RESULTS: In 19 out of 30 patients (63%), guide wire insertion via the minor papilla could be achieved by using ordinary techniques. In total, the guide wire could be inserted in 27 patients (90%) by using the advanced techniques. Before introduction of the Soehendra stent retriever, the major papilla approach was chosen in 38 cases (73%), and the minor papilla approach in 14 cases (27%). After introduction of the Soehendra stent retriever, the major papilla approach was used in 26 cases (93%) and the minor papilla in 2 cases (7%). The frequency of selecting the minor papilla approach has significantly decreased (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The advanced techniques have contributed to the improvement of endoscopic approaches via the minor papilla, and decreased the frequency of selecting the minor papilla approach.

Describe the early outcome of wirsungotomy removing the calculiand pancreatico - jejunostomy

The study was performed in 22 patients with pancreatic stones treated at Surgical Department of Bach Mai Hospital from May 1996 to July 2001. The study was to describe the clinical and paraclinical symptoms as well as the early outcome of wirsungotomy removing the calculi and pancreatico – jejunostomy. The result showed that the disease was more often seen in working ages; more male than females; clinical symptoms were not specific; diagnosis relied mainly on imagery examens. The pancreatolithotomy is effective operation and easy for patients and riquires futher surverying for long term evaluation.